IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI. ---ooo--- RT IMPORT, INC., Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
|
|
- Arabella Rogers
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC APR :53 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ---ooo--- RT IMPORT, INC., Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JESUS TORRES and MILA TORRES dba HAWAIIAN QUILT WHOLESALE, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants, and WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. SCWC CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP ; CIV. NO ) APRIL 13, 2017 RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, McKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT BY McKENNA, J. I. Introduction Jesus and Mila Torres dba Hawaiian Quilt Wholesale ( the Torreses ) appeal an arbitration award between them and RT Import, Inc. ( RT Import ), raising four questions, of which
2 only the first, relating to the circuit court s award of fees and costs, has merit. We hold that the circuit court erred by including in its judgment $4, that was not included in the final arbitration award or otherwise allowed by law. II. Background A. Court Proceedings Prior to Arbitration On May 24, 2012, RT Import filed a complaint in the District Court of the First Circuit against both the Torreses and Worldwide Flight Services ( WFS ) seeking $25,000 in damages for merchandise allegedly misdelivered by WFS to the Torreses, which was then converted by the Torreses. The Torreses answered the complaint and filed a cross-claim against WFS, seeking indemnification and/or contribution in the event they were found liable to RT Import. The Torreses also filed a demand for jury trial, and the case was then transferred to the circuit court. 1 After discovery, RT Import filed a petition to approve a confidential good faith settlement with WFS pursuant to Hawai i Revised Statutes ( HRS ) (Supp. 2012). After the Torreses withdrew their objection, the settlement between RT Import and WFS was approved by the circuit court. A few weeks before the scheduled trial date, after additional pre-trial proceedings and discovery, RT Import and 1 The Honorable Edwin C. Nacino presided. 2
3 the Torreses agreed to resolve their dispute through binding arbitration under the auspices of Dispute Prevention and Resolution, Inc. ( DPR ), and they filed a stipulation for binding arbitration. B. Arbitration Proceedings The following facts were adduced in arbitration. Although the Torreses were to receive forty boxes of merchandise, WFS mistakenly delivered eighty-eight boxes. The mistaken delivery contained eighteen boxes belonging to RT Import, thirty-six belonging to the Torreses, and thirty-four boxes belonging to another company. The Torreses returned the thirty-four boxes belonging to the other company, but they never acknowledged receiving merchandise belonging to RT Import. The arbitrator ruled that although WFS s misdelivery led to the Torreses initial receipt and possession of RT Import s merchandise, the Torreses subsequent actions, including removing RT Import s box labels and selling the merchandise at the Aloha Stadium Swap Meet, proved that they committed the intentional tort of conversion. The Final Award of Arbitrator ( final award ) awarded RT Import a total of $106,711.62, with subtotals of $71, for special damages and $35, for 3
4 general damages for emotional distress. 2 The arbitrator specifically found: 29. As the prevailing party, RT is entitled to the fair market value of the chattel, in addition to any special damages, including compensation for the time and money properly expended in pursuit of the property, plus emotional distress. 30. The undisputed evidence adduced establishes that the fair market retail value of the merchandise [sic] $62, The undisputed evidence adduced from RT establishes the following costs related to this converted merchandise: freight charges of $2,777.53, customs entry services of $1,128.80, airport fees of $35.00, business related airline travel of $2,175.00, incidental travel expenses of $3, All other claims of expenses are denied. 32. RT is also entitled to an award of damages for emotional distress. 33. RT is entitled to be awarded its arbitration costs and expenses. 34. In light of the fact that the claims asserted by RT are tort claims, RT is not entitled to an award of attorney s fees and costs. The arbitrator also ordered: The Respondents are responsible for 100% of the arbitration fees and costs. The Claimant is therefore awarded, and the Respondents shall reimburse to the Claimant directly, all arbitration related fees and costs paid by the Claimant to DPR, and shall pay said fees and costs as directed by Dispute Prevention & Resolution, Inc. 2 RT Import is a corporation. We are unaware of any legal authority that permits an award of emotional distress damages to a corporation. Numerous reported cases preclude emotional distress damages in favor of corporations. See, e.g., F.D.I.C. v. Hulsey, 22 F.3d 1472, 1489 (10th Cir. 1994)(applying Oklahoma law); Interphase Garment Sol., LLC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 566 F. Supp.2d 460, 466 (D. Md. 2008)(applying Maryland law); Earth Scientists (Petro Serv.) Ltd. v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co., 619 F. Supp. 1465, 1474 (D. Kansas 1985)(applying Kansas law); Wilson v. Colonial Penn Life Ins. Co., 454 F. Supp. 1208, 1212, n.9 (D. Minn. 1978)(applying Minnesota law). The emotional distress award was not challenged or appealed, but, in any event, parties who submit their claims to binding arbitration assume all the hazards of the arbitration process, including the risk that the arbitrators may make mistakes in the application of law and in their findings of fact. Nordic PCL Constr., Inc. v. LPIHGC, LLC, 136 Hawai i 29, 41, 358 P.3d 1, 14 (2015). 3 The amounts in paragraphs 30 and 31 total $71, in special damages. 4
5 (Emphasis added.) Pursuant to this portion of the final award, DPR sent RT Import a final invoice ( DPR invoice ), directing the Torreses to immediately remit $3, to RT Import (via their attorney) as reimbursement for arbitration fees. This amount was to reimburse RT Import for its advance toward the arbitrator s fees. Several weeks after DPR issued its invoice, however, RT Import sent a letter directly to the Torreses stating, As agreed by the parties and ordered by the Arbitrator, below please find for your review and payment, the fees and costs of this Arbitration matter. All supporting invoices in regard to costs are enclosed... $8, ( RT Import invoice ) The RT Import invoice listed the following costs: DPR Order/letter: $3, Postage, Photocopying Costs: $2, Deposition transcript of J. Torres, M. Torres, C. Murata: $2, Services of process regarding depositions: $ These amounts total $8, When the $3, in arbitration fees reflected in the DPR invoice is subtracted, the difference is $4, C. Further Circuit Court Proceedings Although they had stipulated to submit this case to binding arbitration, the Torreses filed a Notice of Appeal and Request for Trial De Novo of the final award, citing Rule 22 of the Hawai i Arbitration Rules. On the same day, the Torreses also 5
6 filed a motion with DPR to set aside the final award. The Torreses alleged that RT Import had been made whole through the confidential settlement, rendering the case moot, and that the arbitrator lacked subject matter and personal jurisdiction. RT Import opposed this motion before DPR, arguing that the jurisdictional arguments were meritless, that the parties had stipulated to binding arbitration, and that RT Import had not been made whole by its settlement with WFS. DPR responded that it had no authority under HRS 658A or DPR s Arbitration Rules to rule on the motion. RT Import then filed a motion in the circuit court to confirm the final award pursuant to HRS 658A-22. RT Import requested that judgment be entered in its favor in the amount of $106,663.33, plus $8, in costs paid for postage, photocopying, deposition transcripts, and service of process costs related to the arbitration as well as $1, for attorney s fees incurred in bringing the motion. RT Import included both the DPR invoice and RT Import invoice in its motion to confirm. The Torreses incorporated the arguments contained in their motion with DPR in their opposition memorandum to RT Import s circuit court motion to confirm. The Torresses did not file a motion to vacate or modify the award with the circuit court. 6
7 The circuit court granted RT Import s motion to confirm the final award and entered a judgment awarding RT Import a total of $116,759.91, comprised of $106, for damages, $8, for Plaintiff s Arbitration attorney s fees and costs, and $1, for Plaintiff s Costs of Motion for an Order to Confirm Final Award of Arbitrator Dated April 2, D. Appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals ( ICA ) On appeal to the ICA, the Torreses asserted that the circuit court abused its discretion by: (1) concluding that they were not entitled to a trial de novo on the grounds that this case was not in the Court-Annexed Arbitration Program; (2) awarding attorney s fees and costs to RT Import despite the arbitrator s ruling that attorney s fees were not available for this tort matter; and (3) granting the motion to confirm the final award without confirming whether the arbitrator had subject matter and personal jurisdiction. The Torreses also alleged that DPR s arbitration administrator abused its discretion by refusing to hear and decide their motion to set aside the final award pursuant to the Hawai i Arbitration Rules. 4 In a summary disposition order, the ICA determined that the Torreses appeal was without merit. RT Imp., Inc. v. Torres, No. CAAP , 2016 WL , at *1 (Haw. Ct. App. Oct. 4 DPR s arbitration administrator, which is a court-annexed, non-binding arbitration alternative dispute resolution process, has no connection to the Hawai i Arbitration Rules. 7
8 20, 2016). The ICA resolved the Torreses points on appeal as follows: (1) when the circuit court heard RT Import s Motion to Confirm Award, Appellants did not raise HRS chapter 658A as a basis for challenging the arbitration award; (2) the DPR case manager had no authority to consider or rule on the Appellants' Motion to Set Aside under HRS chapter 658A; and (3) this case was never part of the Court Annexed Arbitration Program or subject to the rules of the program, but instead was conducted pursuant to HRS chapter 658A. The ICA therefore affirmed the circuit court s confirmation of the final arbitration award and judgment. E. Application for Writ of Certiorari The Torreses raise the following four questions on certiorari: 1. Whether the ICA gravely erred in concluding that the circuit court properly awarded attorney s fees in an arbitration case where the awarding of attorney s fees was precluded by the arbitrator pursuant to the American rule and where no language in the arbitration agreement permitted the awarding of attorney s fees? 2. Whether the ICA gravely erred in concluding an arbitration case may proceed to trial and a verdict may be obtained, even where the facts show that prior to the commencement of the arbitration trial, the injured party was made whole prior to the commencement of that trial? 3. Whether the ICA gravely erred in affirming the award of an arbitration award of $106,711.62, where Plaintiff only sought $15,800 in damages? 4. Whether the ICA gravely erred in concluding that measure of damages in case [sic] tort case involving the tort of conversion is the value of the chattel at the time of the judgment? III. Standards of Review A. Review of an arbitration award Where a party challenges an arbitration award, the following precepts are applicable. First, because of the legislative policy to encourage arbitration and thereby 8
9 discourage litigation, arbitrators have broad discretion in resolving the dispute. Upon submission of an issue, the arbitrator has authority to determine the entire question, including the legal construction of terms of a contract or lease, as well as the disputed facts. In fact, where the parties agree to arbitrate, they thereby assume all the hazards of the arbitration process, including the risk that the arbitrators may make mistakes in the application of law and in their findings of fact. Second, correlatively, judicial review of an arbitration award is confined to the strictest possible limits. An arbitration award may be vacated only on the four grounds specified in HRS and modified and corrected only on the three grounds specified in HRS Moreover, the courts have no business weighing the merits of the award. Third, HRS and 10 also restrict the authority of appellate courts to review judgments entered by circuit courts confirming or vacating the arbitration awards..... The promulgation of HRS chapter 658A has not materially changed this standard of review. Judicial review of arbitration awards remains limited to the statutory grounds for confirmation, vacatur, modification, and correction. Nordic PCL Constr., Inc., 136 Hawai i at 41-42, 358 P.3d at B. Statutory interpretation Statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewable de novo. Our construction of statutes is guided by the following rules: First, the fundamental starting point for statutoryinterpretation is the language of the statute itself. Second, where the statutory language is plain and unambiguous, our sole duty is to give effect to its plain and obvious meaning. Third, implicit in the task of statutory construction is our foremost obligation to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature, which is to be obtained primarily from the language contained in the statute itself. Fourth, when there is doubt, doubleness of meaning, or indistinctiveness or uncertainty of an expression used in a statute, an ambiguity exists. 9
10 Panado v. Bd. of Trs., Emps. Ret. Sys., 134 Hawai i 1, 10-11, 332 P.3d 144, (2014) (internal quotation marks and citations removed). IV. Discussion A. The circuit court erred by including in its judgment $4, not included in the arbitration award and not allowable under HRS 658A-25. In their first question on certiorari, the Torreses challenge the circuit court s award of attorney s fees as part of the judgment, alleging that such fees were not authorized by the arbitrator. HRS 658A-25 (Supp. 2012) Judgment on award; attorney's fees and litigation expenses provides: (a) Upon granting an order confirming, vacating without directing a rehearing, modifying, or correcting an award, the court shall enter a judgment in conformity therewith. The judgment may be recorded, docketed, and enforced as any other judgment in a civil action. (b) A court may allow reasonable costs of the motion and subsequent judicial proceedings. (c) On application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under section 658A-22, 658A-23, or 658A-24, the court may add reasonable attorney s fees and other reasonable expenses of litigation incurred in a judicial proceeding after the award is made to a judgment confirming, vacating without directing a rehearing, modifying, or correcting an award. HRS 658A-25. There were two amounts in the judgment characterized as attorney s fees, both of which have been challenged by the Torreses in the circuit court and on appeal. These amounts are the $1, award characterized by the circuit court as Plaintiff s Costs of Motion and the $8,
11 award characterized by the circuit court as Plaintiff s Arbitration attorney s fees and costs. 1. The $1, award was properly included in the circuit court judgment pursuant to HRS (c). The circuit court characterized the $1, in attorney s fees incurred by RT Import in the judicial proceedings to confirm the final award as Plaintiff s Costs of Motion, which appear to correspond to amounts allowed under HRS 658A-25(b) (Supp. 2012). The amounts were for attorney s fees in bringing the motion to confirm the final award under HRS 658A-22 (Supp. 2012). Pursuant to the language of the statute, the amounts are therefore governed by HRS 658A-25(c). Although the $1, was mischaracterized, HRS 658A- 25(c) allows a court to award attorney s fees incurred in judicial proceedings to confirm an arbitration award when a motion to confirm award under HRS 658A-22 is contested. See In re Arbitration Between United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO and City and Cty. of Honolulu, 119 Hawai i 201, 209, 194 P.3d 1163, 1171 (App. 2008) (noting that attorney s fees on a motion to confirm award are only allowable to a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under HRS 658A-22, 658A- 23, or 658A-24). In this case, the Torreses contested RT Import s HRS 658A-22 judicial proceedings to confirm the award. 11
12 Therefore, the circuit court s judgment properly included the amount of $1,692.80, as it was awarded pursuant to HRS 658A- 25(c) for attorney s fees incurred in the judicial proceeding regarding the contested award. 2. The circuit court was without authority to include in its judgment $4, of the $8, award characterized as arbitration attorneys fees and costs because that amount was not included in the arbitration award. With respect to the $8, award characterized by the circuit court as arbitration attorneys fees and costs, this amount included the: (1) $3, for arbitrator s fees in the DPR invoice, and (2) additional amounts totalling $4, in the RT Import invoice, which consisted of $2, in postage and photocopying costs, $2, for deposition transcripts, and $ for service of process costs for depositions. The arbitrator s final award, however, stated as follows: The Respondents are responsible for 100% of the arbitration fees and costs. The Claimant is therefore awarded, and the Respondents shall reimburse to the Claimant directly, all arbitration related fees and costs paid by the Claimant to DPR, and shall pay said fees and costs as directed by Dispute Prevention & Resolution, Inc. (Emphasis added.) The DPR invoice, issued pursuant to the final award, directed the Torreses to pay $3, for the arbitrator s fees. Although the separate RT Import invoice asserted that the parties had agreed to the additional amounts, the Torreses object to these amounts characterized as 12
13 arbitration attorney s fees throughout these judicial proceedings. Whether the circuit court could include the extra $4, not directed by DPR to be paid by the Torreses to RT Import is an issue of statutory interpretation. The plain language of HRS 5 658A-22 authorizes the circuit court to confirm the award. The award includes the $3, as directed by DPR, but not the additional $4, separately invoiced directly by RT Import to the Torreses. Therefore, the circuit court erred by including in its judgment the $4,738.74, which was not part of the arbitration award. B. Based on the deference given to arbitration awards, the court did not err in confirming the remainder of the final arbitration award in its entirety. In the second, third, and fourth questions raised on certiorari, the Torreses allege that the arbitrator erred by awarding damages because RT Imports had been made whole by its settlement with WFS, by awarding damages that exceeded the $15,800 purportedly originally sought by RT Imports, and by applying an incorrect measure of damages. In Section III(A) 5 HRS 658A-22 provides: Confirmation of award. After a party to an arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may make a motion to the court for an order confirming the award at which time the court shall issue a confirming order unless the award is modified or corrected pursuant to section 658A-20 or 658A-24 or is vacated pursuant to section 658A
14 above, we outlined the standards governing judicial review of an arbitration award, including: because of the legislative policy to encourage arbitration and thereby discourage litigation, arbitrators have broad discretion in resolving the dispute. Upon submission of an issue, the arbitrator has authority to determine the entire question, including the legal construction of terms of a contract or lease, as well as the disputed facts. In fact, where the parties agree to arbitrate, they thereby assume all the hazards of the arbitration process, including the risk that the arbitrators may make mistakes in the application of law and in their findings of fact. Second, correlatively, judicial review of an arbitration award is confined to the strictest possible limits.... Moreover, the courts have no business weighing the merits of the award. Nordic PCL Constr., Inc., 136 Hawai i at 41, 358 P.3d at 13. In addition, HRS 658A-21(c)(Supp. 2012) specifically provides in relevant part: [A]n arbitrator may order such remedies as the arbitrator considers just and appropriate under the circumstances of the arbitration proceeding. The fact that such a remedy could not or would not be granted by the court is not a ground for refusing to confirm an award under section 658A Accordingly, pursuant to the standards governing judicial review of arbitration awards, the second, third, and fourth questions on certiorari are outside the scope of permitted judicial review. V. Conclusion In this case, the circuit court erred by including in the judgment confirming the arbitration award $4, directly billed by RT Import to the Torreses, which was not a part of the final award. Accordingly, we otherwise affirm but vacate the 14
15 ICA s Judgment on Appeal and the circuit court s Judgment as to $4, of the $8, for Plaintiff s Arbitration attorney s fees and costs, and remand this case to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. In all other respects, the ICA s Judgment on Appeal is affirmed. Barry L. Sooalo for petitioner Robert E. Badger for respondent /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 15
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---ooo--- ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF DISCOVERY BAY, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000151 13-NOV-2014 07:51 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---ooo--- ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF DISCOVERY BAY, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI. ---o0o--- SCWC CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION, INC., Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001160 20-SEP-2016 07:56 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ---o0o--- SCWC-14-0001160 CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION, INC., Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---ooo---
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001134 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---ooo--- U.S. BANK N.A. IN ITS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES
More informationSCWC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
SCWC-12-0000870 Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000870 24-APR-2013 03:00 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ASSOCIATION OF CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS OF TROPICS AT WAIKELE, by its
More informationSCWC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000315 28-FEB-2014 11:33 AM SCWC-12-0000315 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I DONALD EDWARD KROG, in his capacity as Trustee of the Donald Edward
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I. ---o0o--
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000711 30-JUN-2016 09:13 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I ---o0o-- ROBERT E. WIESENBERG, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I;
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- BRUCE EDWARD COX Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000762 16-AUG-2016 08:05 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- BRUCE EDWARD COX Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CARLYN DAVIDSON COX,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI. ---ooo--- vs. STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Defendant-Appellee. SCAP
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-16-0000462 21-MAR-2019 08:05 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ---ooo--- TAX FOUNDATION OF HAWAIʻI, a Hawaiʻi non-profit corporation, on behalf of
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-10-0000013 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I AMBER FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC., JULIAN KOZAR, TRENA PAPAGEORGE, and PETTRICE GAMBOL, Respondents/Appellants-Appellants, v.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- DAVID PANOKE, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000556 14-DEC-2015 08:18 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- DAVID PANOKE, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant, vs. REEF DEVELOPMENT OF HAWAI
More informationSCRU IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. In the Matter of the HAWAI I RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE ORDER AMENDING RULES OF THE
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCRU-10-0000012 12-APR-2016 10:06 AM SCRU-10-0000012 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I In the Matter of the HAWAI I RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE ORDER AMENDING
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-28901 31-DEC-2013 09:48 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, vs. ROBERT J.
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
NO. CAAP-16-0000805 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ROSEMARIE GAETA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WEST MAUI RESORT PARTNERS, LP, Defendant-Appellant, and DOE CORPORATIONS 1-5, DOE
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-16-0000780 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I NATHAN PACO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARY K. MYERS, dba MARY K. MYERS, Ph.D., dba MARY MYERS, Ph.D., INC., aka MARY MYERS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. In the Matter of the
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCRU-11-0000415 18-MAY-2011 01:58 PM In the Matter of the TEMPORARY RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVERSION PROCEEDING
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-11-0000347 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JULIE PHOMPHITHACK, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST
More informationCase 2:17-cv SJF-AKT Document 9 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 64
Case 2:17-cv-00722-SJF-AKT Document 9 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X TRUSTEES
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
NO. CAAP-14-0001353 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I TAEKYU U, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent-Appellee, APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
NO. CAAP-16-0000109 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALVIN K. KANOA, JR., Defendant-Appellee APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCRU-11-0000415 18-MAY-2011 01:58 PM In the Matter of the TEMPORARY RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVERSION PROCEEDING
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI. ---ooo---
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000865 29-OCT-2018 08:24 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ---ooo--- STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. MATTHEW SEAN SASAI,
More informationSCAD IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. ANDRÉ S. WOOTEN, Respondent.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-14-0001333 11-DEC-2015 08:28 AM SCAD-14-0001333 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. ANDRÉ S. WOOTEN, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI. ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000558 18-JAN-2018 08:01 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BENJAMIN EDUWENSUYI,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000030 15-AUG-2017 08:09 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ANTHONY R. VILLENA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---ooo---
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000445 08-DEC-2016 08:58 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---ooo--- ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF ROYAL ALOHA, a Hawai i nonprofit corporation,
More informationIN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I ---o0o-- STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. DREW CLEMENTE, Defendant-Appellee. CAAP-11-0000027 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
NO. CAAP-16-0000141 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I KEAUHOU CANOE CLUB, A Hawaii Nonprofit Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE
More informationNo. 132, September Term, 1993 PORTER HAYDEN COMPANY v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY. [Dismissal Of An Appeal For Lack Of A Final Judgment]
No. 132, September Term, 1993 PORTER HAYDEN COMPANY v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY [Dismissal Of An Appeal For Lack Of A Final Judgment] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 132 September Term,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000758 06-FEB-2014 09:26 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MICHAEL W. BASHAM, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-12-0000450 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I PAUL K. CULLEN aka PAUL KAUKA NAKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAVINIA CURRIER and PUU O HOKU RANCH, LTD., Defendants-Appellees.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI. ---ooo--- FRIENDS OF MAKAKILO, Petitioner/Intervenor/Cross-Appellant-Appellant, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-13-0002408 30-OCT-2014 08:58 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ---ooo--- FRIENDS OF MAKAKILO, Petitioner/Intervenor/Cross-Appellant-Appellant, vs.
More informationSCWC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. vs. STANLEY S.L. KONG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000393 13-JUN-2013 02:57 PM SCWC-11-0000393 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. STANLEY S.L. KONG,
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
NO. CAAP-18-0000361 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I WW, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DS, Respondent-Appellee, and CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent-Appellee
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o---
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-16-0000462 21-MAR-2019 08:12 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- TAX FOUNDATION OF HAWAI I, a Hawai i non-profit corporation, on behalf of
More informationSCRU IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I. In the Matter of the Amendment of the HAWAI'I RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCRU-10-0000012 14-DEC-2011 12:35 PM SCRU-10-0000012 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I In the Matter of the Amendment of the HAWAI'I RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DOREEN C. CONSIDINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED December 15, 2009 v No. 283298 Oakland Circuit Court THOMAS D. CONSIDINE, LC No. 2005-715192-DM Defendant-Appellee.
More informationMAY 6, 2015 BUDDY SCARBERRY NO CA-1256 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL
BUDDY SCARBERRY VERSUS ENTERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY SERVICES, INC., ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C., AND ENTERGY LOUISIANA, L.L.C. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2014-CA-1256 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- KILAKILA O HALEAKALA, Petitioner/Appellant-Appellant, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000353 13-DEC-2013 12:25 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- KILAKILA O HALEAKALA, Petitioner/Appellant-Appellant, vs. BOARD OF LAND AND
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No. 09-CV-3252-RLV. versus
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 19, 2010 No. 10-10927 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK D. C. Docket
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-11-0000299 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I HAWAIIAN DREDGING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Petitioner-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent-Appellant,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY
[Cite as Portsmouth v. Fraternal Order of Police Scioto Lodge 33, 2006-Ohio-4387.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY City of Portsmouth, : Plaintiff-Appellant/ : Cross-Appellee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: July 2, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed: July 2, 2007 Cite as: 2007 Guam 4 Supreme Court Case No.: CRA06-003 Superior Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000402 16-MAY-2018 09:41 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RACHEL VIAMOANA UI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
NO. CAAP-16-0000030 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROGELIO LAHIP GANOTISI, also known as ROGER GANOTISI, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit January 23, 2019 Elisabeth A.
More informationt #- Document hosted at No
t #- No. 28822 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII COUNTY OF HAWAII, a municipal corporation, CIVIL NO. 05-1-015K Plaintiff-Appellee, APPEAL FROM FIRST AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT vs. (iled September
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LADONNA NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION May 16, 2017 9:10 a.m. and No. 329733 Wayne Circuit Court MERIDIAN HEALTH PLAN OF MICHIGAN, LC No. 13-004369-NH also
More informationNO IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIfI
NO. 29521 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIfI MHI LLC doing business as SCU HOLDINGS, A FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN HAWAII, Plaintiff- Appellee,
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-17-0000373 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I LEON R. ROUSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW R. WALDEN, Defendant-Appellee APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DANIEL BELLO HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED February 19, 2013 v No. 307544 Wayne Circuit Court GAUCHO, LLC, d/b/a GAUCHO LC No. 08-015861-CZ STEAKHOUSE,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI. ---ooo--- TRUST CREATED UNDER THE WILL OF SAMUEL M. DAMON, Deceased SCWC
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000731 15-JUN-2017 09:08 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ---ooo--- TRUST CREATED UNDER THE WILL OF SAMUEL M. DAMON, Deceased SCWC-12-0000731
More information09-FEB-2018 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I 10:22 AM. ---ooo---
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND THE PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-16-0000496 09-FEB-2018 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I 10:22 AM ---ooo---
More informationChapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS
Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS 201. CREATION OF THE BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS. There shall be a Bay Mills Court of Appeals consisting of the three appeals judges. Any number of judges may be appointed
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. ROBERT R. COLE, JR., Appellant V. GWENDOLYN PARKER, INC.
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 4, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01655-CV ROBERT R. COLE, JR., Appellant V. GWENDOLYN PARKER, INC., Appellee On Appeal from
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 22, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-1517 Lower Tribunal No. 16-31938 Asset Recovery
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I. ---o0o-- In the Matter of the THOMAS H. GENTRY REVOCABLE TRUST SCWC
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000428 28-JUN-2016 01:08 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I ---o0o-- In the
More informationNo. 52,304-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered September 26, 2018. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 52,304-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * *
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-14-0001098 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I RODILLO M. TABUYO, SR. and MERLINA D. TABUYO, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. ROBERT C. REISH and SUSAN N. REISH, INDIVIDUALLY
More informationCAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
CAAP-14-0000920 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I SHIGEZO HAWAII, INC., a Hawai'i Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOY TO THE WORLD INCORPORATED, a Hawai'i Corporation; INOC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- ERWIN E. FAGARAGAN, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, vs. SCWC
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000592 14-FEB-2014 02:30 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- ERWIN E. FAGARAGAN, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, vs. STATE OF HAWAI I,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI. ---o0o--- EDWIN GARCIA, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000388 03-MAY-2016 08:29 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ---o0o--- EDWIN GARCIA, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. BERNARD ROBINSON, M.D.,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE On-Brief May 25, 2007
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE On-Brief May 25, 2007 MBNA AMERICA, N.A. v. MICHAEL J. DAROCHA A Direct Appeal from the circuit Court for Johnson County No. 2772 The Honorable Jean A.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2013-NMCA-019 Filing Date: November 14, 2012 Docket No. 30,773 JOURNEYMAN CONSTRUCTION, LP, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, PREMIER HOSPITALITY
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS TIMOTHY PAUL KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION April 16, 2002 9:00 a.m. v No. 223731 Ingham Circuit Court DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LC No. 99-090575-AA Defendant-Appellee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001121 15-MAY-2017 08:15 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RAYMOND S. DAVIS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2008
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2008 Opinion filed June 11, 2008. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D07-409 Lower Tribunal No. 03-28347
More informationSCRU IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. In the Matter of the Amendment. of the
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCRU-11-0000083 20-APR-2011 01:22 PM SCRU-11-0000083 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I In the Matter of the Amendment of the HAWAI I RULES OF PENAL PROCEDURE
More informationNo. 117,987 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. DAMON L. PIERSON, Appellee, CITY OF TOPEKA, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 117,987 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS DAMON L. PIERSON, Appellee, v. CITY OF TOPEKA, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under K.S.A. 77-607(b)(2), nonfinal agency action is "the whole
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-12-0000734 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I DON MARIE CHUNG, Claimant-Appellant, v. MEDASSETS INSOURCE, INC., Employer-Appellee, and HAWAII EMPLOYERS' MUTUAL INSURANCE
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
CHRISTINE WARREN, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 18, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court Plaintiff - Appellant, v.
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-12-0000847 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF NIHILANI AT PRINCEVILLE RESORT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NIHILANI GROUP, LLC; BROOKFIELD
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GUARDIAN ANGEL HEALTHCARE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 14, 2013 v No. 307825 Wayne Circuit Court PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE LC No. 08-120128-NF COMPANY,
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RICHARD A. MOTTOLO
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N SUPREME COURT. v No The issue in this case is whether plaintiff, Acorn Investment Co.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Opinion Chief Justice: Robert P. Young, Jr. Justices: Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- vs. CEDRIC K. KIKUTA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant. NO
Electronically Filed Supreme Court 29445 08-JUN-2011 08:34 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- STATE OF HAWAI I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CEDRIC K. KIKUTA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LAWRENCE HILL, ADAM WISE, ) NO. 66137-0-I and ROBERT MILLER, on their own ) behalves and on behalf of all persons ) DIVISION ONE similarly situated, )
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-12-0000865 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A. AS SUCCESSOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:16-cv-06848-CAS-GJS Document 17 Filed 12/14/16 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:268 Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Catherine Jeang Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
More informationFiled: October 17, 1997
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 3 September Term, 1997 SHELDON H. LERMAN v. KERRY R. HEEMAN Bell, C.J. Eldridge Rodowsky Chasanow Raker Wilner Karwacki (retired, specially assigned) JJ. Opinion
More informationCommencing the Arbitration
Chapter 6 Commencing the Arbitration David C. Singer* 6:1 Procedural Rules Governing Commencement of Arbitration 6:1.1 Revised Uniform Arbitration Act 6:2 Applicable Rules of Arbitral Institutions 6:2.1
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. DOCKET NO. 3:08-cv FDW
Lomick et al v. LNS Turbo, Inc. et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:08-cv-00296-FDW JAMES LOMICK, ESTHER BARNETT,
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
NO. CAAP-15-0000510 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I PETER GELSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KA ONO ULU ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LEWIS MATTHEWS III and DEBORAH MATTHEWS, UNPUBLISHED March 2, 2006 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v No. 251333 Wayne Circuit Court REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE LC No. 97-717377-NF
More information06-DEC :28 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---ooo--- PEAK CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001125 06-DEC-2017 02:28 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---ooo--- PEAK CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHRISTOPHER HULL
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- WILLIAM GIL PERENGUEZ,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ALLENTON BROWNE, Appellant/Defendant, v. LAURA L.Y. GORE, Appellee/Plaintiff. Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 155/2010 (STX On Appeal from the Superior
More informationUniform Arbitration Act. Md. Courts & Judicial Proceedings COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS TITLE 3. COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION
Uniform Arbitration Act Md. Courts & Judicial Proceedings. 3-201 - 3-234 COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS TITLE 3. COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION JURISDICTION/SPECIAL CAUSES OF ACTION SUBTITLE 2. ARBITRATION
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-1620 Cellular Sales of Missouri, LLC lllllllllllllllllllllpetitioner v. National Labor Relations Board lllllllllllllllllllllrespondent ------------------------------
More informationSonic-Denver T, Inc., d/b/a Mountain States Toyota, and American Arbitration Association, Inc., JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 10CA0275 Adams County District Court No. 09CV500 Honorable Katherine R. Delgado, Judge Ken Medina, Milton Rosas, and George Sourial, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CLYDE EVERETT, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 15, 2010 v No. 287640 Lapeer Circuit Court AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 06-037406-NF Defendant-Appellant.
More informationPRESENT: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Millette, JJ., and Carrico, S.J.
PRESENT: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Millette, JJ., and Carrico, S.J. COTTON CREEK CIRCLES, LLC, ET AL. v. Record No. 090283 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN February 25,
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
NO. CAAP-18-0000030 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2006-HE4 AKA DEUTSCHE BANK
More informationRULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Tribal Council Resolution
RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE Tribal Council Resolution 16--2008 Section I. Title and Codification This Ordinance shall be known as the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribal Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 28, 2013
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 28, 2013 RODNEY V. JOHNSON v. TRANE U.S. INC., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000880-09 Gina
More informationNO IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
NO.29379 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I DENISE SHANER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of THOMAS B. ROTH; MILDRED L. ROTH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHAEL M. KRAUS;
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-13-0002509 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHIT WAI YU, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
More informationUNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND, et al. ERSKINE TROUBLEFIELD
UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 767 September Term, 2016 PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND, et al. v. ERSKINE TROUBLEFIELD Arthur, Shaw Geter, Battaglia, Lynne A. (Senior Judge,
More informationv No Washtenaw Circuit Court v No
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS NDC OF SYLVAN, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED May 19, 2011 v No. 301397 Washtenaw Circuit Court TOWNSHIP OF SYLVAN, LC No. 07-000826-CZ -1- Defendant-Appellant/Cross-
More informationGreer v. Town Constr. Co. (La. App., 2012)
JONATHAN GREER AND RENE GREER v. TOWN CONSTRUCTION CO, INC, CHRISTOPHER A. TOWN, CHRIS TOWN CONSTRUCTION, LLC AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY NO. 2011 CA 1360 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED MAY 2 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ROYCE MATHEW, No. 15-56726 v. Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-07832-RGK-AGR
More information